571
Politică / Razboiul Ucraina-Rusia
« on: 03 October 2022, 18:55 »
Mai, baieti, voi chiar stiti ce spuneti acolo?
Deah. Ai idee cat costa sa menti 6500 (sau cate zice Rusia ca are) focoase nucleare?? In ce hal se prezinta mareata armata Rosie nu m-ar mira ca 90% din arsenalul lor nuclear sa fie inutilizabil. Chiar si cele care sunt "deployed" (cica gata de lansare) m-ar mira sa fie 100% functionale ...
Ma ales ca majoritatea au fost construite in anii 60. Asta inseamna ca uranium-ul (U-235) ala e inert deja.
https://www.energy.gov/nnsa/maintaining-stockpile
https://www.brookings.edu/the-hidden-costs-of-our-nuclear-arsenal-overview-of-project-findings/
"Today, the Department of Energy is proposing to spend at a least $4.5 billion a year on “stockpile stewardship” activities to maintain the nuclear stockpile for the indefinite future without nuclear testing and without large-scale production of new weapons. As you can see, this will be more than what we have spent on average over the entire Cold War (1948-1991), $3.6 billion, when hundreds to thousands of new warheads were being built annually and nuclear testing was a common occurrence."
Btw:
"Fifty-seven percent of all the megatonnage exploded in the atmosphere–244 megatons?occurred between September 1961 and December 1962. That is the equivalent of 16,250 Hiroshima-sized bombs."
Adica 16250 de bombe de tip Hiroshima au fost deja detonate si noi inca suntem aici ...