1
Politică / Razboiul Ucraina-Rusia
« on: 26 October 2022, 22:48 »
Ok bun, credeam ca tu chiar ai ceva serios nu pura caterinca a 2 fosile Kremliniste, carry on bro.
The following users liked or thanked this post: mache
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion Game of the Year Edition Deluxe free ptr cei cu amazon primeUnde?
Sent from my Mi 9T using Tapatalk
Indoielile sunt mai mult pe "vaccinurile" cu mesager informatic, pe AZ si pe J&J, pentru care s-au evidentiat multe efecte secundare, dintre care unele extrem de nasoale, adica pe cele promovate in vest la nivel exclusiv. Pe vaccinurile produse in alte tari discutiile se concentreaza pe "eficienta", ceea ce e alta treaba. Pot sa fie mai putin eficiente daca nu sunt periculoase. Iar aici nu avem optiunea de a alege intre cele mai putin eficiente dar mai putin periculoase si cele experimentale potential mult mai periculoase. Daca ar lasa lumea sa se vaccineze cu ce vaccin vrea, in mod sigur s-ar vaccina mai multi. E vorba despre interese politice si corporatiste vs sanatate.Faci confuzii grave. Pfizer si Moderna sunt vaccinuri cu mesager informatic mRNA. AZ, J&J si Sputnik sunt vaccinuri clasice pe baza de adenovirus.
Alexey NavalnyQuote1. I think that the ban of Donald Trump on Twitter is an unacceptable act of censorship (THREAD)
2. Of course, during his time in the office, Trump has been writing and saying very irresponsible things. And paid for it by not getting re-elected for a second term.
3. The election is a straightforward and competitive process. You can participate in it, you can appeal against the results, they're being monitored by millions of people. The ban on Twitter is a decision of people we don't know in accordance with a procedure we don't know.
4. In my opinion, the decision to ban Trump was based on emotions and personal political preferences.
5. Don't tell me he was banned for violating Twitter rules. I get death threats here every day for many years, and Twitter doesn't ban anyone (not that I ask for it).
6. Among the people who have Twitter accounts are cold-blooded murderers (Putin or Maduro) and liars and thieves (Medvedev). For many years, Twitter, Facebook and Instagram have been used as a base for Putin's "troll factory" and similar groups from other authoritarian countries
7. Those who denied COVID-19 exist freely and communicate on Twitter. Their words have cost thousands of lives. And yet, it was Trump who got banned publicly and ostentatiously. Such selectivity indicates that this was an act of censorship.
8. Of course, Twitter is a private company, but we have seen many examples in Russian and China of such private companies becoming the state's best friends and the enablers when it comes to censorship.
9. If you replace "Trump" with "Navalny" in today's discussion, you will get an 80% accurate Kremlin's answer as to why my name can't be mentioned on Russian TV and I shouldn't be allowed to participate in any elections.
10. This precedent will be exploited by the enemies of freedom of speech around the world. In Russia as well. Every time when they need to silence someone, they will say: 'this is just common practice, even Trump got blocked on Twitter'.
11. If @Twitter and @jack want to do things right, they need to create some sort of a committee that can make such decisions. We need to know the names of the members of this committee, understand how it works, how its members vote and how we can appeal against their decisions.