The Cloverfield Paradox - meh. Poate un 6 pentru că ar fi putut fi ceva interesant însă luat la sânge, bate spre un 4. Are idei drăguțe,dar care nu prea se pupă între ele în același film. Povestea are potențial,dar au dat-o de gard. Fie din scenariu, fie din regie. Fie ambele.
Par a fi vreo 3 filme într-unul singur, toate proaste, dar așa, amestecate, te țin până la capăt, sperând că ghiveciul ajunge la un punct final in care se leagă.
Prea multe neconcordanțe și necunoscute, pe care le lasă în aer pe linia narativă, nici măcar nu se mulțumesc să încerce să-ți dea vreo tentativă de răspuns sau rezolvare, și eu unul bag plwa când mi se servește așa ceva.

The big short - re-vazut a 3-a? 4-a oara? Ar fi un film de 10 pentrtu stilul documentar artistic.

Mi se pare mie sau episoadele din S5 Expanse sunt cam searbede?
Dialoguri subtiri, regia cam de 2 lei, spre telenovelistic.
Mai ales de pe la episodul 5 incepand...

Streaming network Disney Plus has blocked young children aged 7 and under from watching 'Peter Pan', 'Dumbo' and 'The Aristocats' after the three movies were accused of breaching content advisories for scenes of racial profiling.

The movies will no longer appear in the kids’ section of the app.

https://www.skynews.com.au/details/_6225823714001

Video Compilation Of Trump Rioters Getting Arrested To Goodfellas Song Goes Viral

Apparently so does the term #DomesticTerrorists
Welcome to a brave new world.

Nu-s de acord cu ban-ul, fiindcă mai ales în perioada asta şi imediat după dobitocul trebuia ţinut sub ochi. Trebuia suspendat când sărea calul, dar probabil n-au vrut să mai rişte. S-a văzut de ce e în stare licheaua când e încolţită.

+1

Partea proasta este ca genul asta de miscari, incluzand si de-platforming-ul sau cancelling-ul Parler este exact in linia naratiunilor (cat de cat extreme la momentul nasterii lor) unor oligofreni gen Trump sau Alex Jones sau Q-Anon si multi altii, care au o multime de saraci cu duhul ca audienta si pe care ajung sa ii educe si sa-i construiasca exact pe panta aia de extrema dreapta, aia despre care stanga democrata - sau nu - tot bate toba de niste ani. Din ciclul 'de ce ti-e frica nu scapi. Ba, ajungi, constient dar mai ales sub-constient sa-ti constuiesti proprii demoni'.
Oricine ai fi, individ, patron de (social) media, consiliu de administratie, CEO, HR, PR manager & shit, iti trebuie ceva maturitate de gandire pentru a asculta niste opinii diferite de ale tale, si de a sti cum sa le administrezi pentru a nu crea o situatie si mai complicata si neplacuta decat cea actuala.
Bummer.

---

Post Merge: 11 January 2021, 22:38

---

This just in.

Alexey Navalny

1. I think that the ban of Donald Trump on Twitter is an unacceptable act of censorship (THREAD)
2. Of course, during his time in the office, Trump has been writing and saying very irresponsible things. And paid for it by not getting re-elected for a second term.
3. The election is a straightforward and competitive process. You can participate in it, you can appeal against the results, they're being monitored by millions of people. The ban on Twitter is a decision of people we don't know in accordance with a procedure we don't know.
4. In my opinion, the decision to ban Trump was based on emotions and personal political preferences.
5. Don't tell me he was banned for violating Twitter rules. I get death threats here every day for many years, and Twitter doesn't ban anyone (not that I ask for it).
6. Among the people who have Twitter accounts are cold-blooded murderers (Putin or Maduro) and liars and thieves (Medvedev). For many years, Twitter, Facebook and Instagram have been used as a base for Putin's "troll factory" and similar groups from other authoritarian countries
7. Those who denied COVID-19 exist freely and communicate on Twitter. Their words have cost thousands of lives. And yet, it was Trump who got banned publicly and ostentatiously. Such selectivity indicates that this was an act of censorship.
8. Of course, Twitter is a private company, but we have seen many examples in Russian and China of such private companies becoming the state's best friends and the enablers when it comes to censorship.
9. If you replace "Trump" with "Navalny" in today's discussion, you will get an 80% accurate Kremlin's answer as to why my name can't be mentioned on Russian TV and I shouldn't be allowed to participate in any elections.
10. This precedent will be exploited by the enemies of freedom of speech around the world. In Russia as well. Every time when they need to silence someone, they will say: 'this is just common practice, even Trump got blocked on Twitter'.
11. If @Twitter and @jack want to do things right, they need to create some sort of a committee that can make such decisions. We need to know the names of the members of this committee, understand how it works, how its members vote and how we can appeal against their decisions.