Tu nu intelegi cum functioneaza lucrurile, cum se manipuleaza informatiile si ca nu intru in discutii cu tine. Pe tema Malone au fost discutii aprinse intre cei care scriu informatii acolo, si nu orice ciumpalac poate edita informatiile fara ca treaba sa nu fie observata. Sunt unii care vor sa stearga informatiile despre el din motive evidente si altii care vor sa mentina informatiile.
Doar cine nu vrea sa vada nu vede cum se manipuleaza informatia.
RNA vaccine: Revision history"Names of researchers only make the text heavier to read, do not add anything encyclopedic, and give undue emphasis on that aspect when really it isn't that important..."
"Let's have SOMETHING relatively uncontroversial as a stable version, without Malone stuck in every other sentence, and work from there on Talk...."
"
Leave it as it is - take it to the talk page.
Every scientific discovery I have ever read includes the discoverers. Otherwise how would we know the history of our great inventors and discoverers.
To delete them makes Wikipedia look foolish and inept.."
"
We need to stop scrubbing historical facts from Wikipedia."
"
Important to include the researchers in this article. Why hide it?"
Ca sa nu mai vorbim despre cenzura practicata de Google care ascunde tot ce e hotarat ca nu mai trebuie vazut si despre alte platforme virtuale care cenzureaza tot.