Mai e si asta: AMD EPYC 'Rome' CPU benchmarks: 64C/128T kills competition

"Remember this is an engineering sample so there's always lower clock speeds than what the final chips will offer, but even with its lower CPU clocks it beats the crap out of virtually everything else on the database coming in third for arithmetic scores."

"AMD is reportedly getting the Radeon RX 3080 XT ready for E3 2019 with its Navi 10 GPU on the 7nm node, with what should be 8GB of GDDR6 memory. The Navi 10 GPU will, according to the new leaks, feature 56 compute units from the Navi 10 GPU on a 190W TDP and provide performance close to NVIDIA's Turing-based GeForce RTX 2070. All of this will reportedly launch for $330 which would be a game changer.

"The news is directly from a PR manager for SAPPHIRE during a chat with Chinese press, with the rep saying AMD is working on two Navi SKUs: the first is going to cost $399 while the higher-end Navi will cost $499. The $399 card will reportedly compete with NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 2060 while the $499 model will fight with the RTX 2070. This new rumor blows out the $330-priced Radeon RX 3080 XT that would be a RTX 2070 competitor, but there's no mention of the name here."(tweaktown)

Preturile vehiculate sunt comparabile cu cele de la Nvidia. Ca sa fie interesante ar trebui sa fie ceva mai performante decat RTX 2070/2060.

De ce sa nu construim centrale? Pana la urma nu exista o modalitate mai buna nu? Poate am citit cam multe conspiratii si ma las dus de val, insa nu cred nici pentru o secunda ca asta este solutia cea mai buna,hai sa scriu,cea mai eficienta gasita de noi,de specia umana,pur si simplu nu exista altceva, ceva mai putin costisitor,mai putin periculos.

Problema nu tine de conspiratii ci de o cultura tehnica specifica care evident iti lipseste. Ca urmare te lasi aburit de tot felul de povesti din media. Mai sunt situatii in care unele state isi permit sa mai construiasca centrale nucleare pe tot felul de considerente specifice, dar in principiu afacerea cu energia nucleara e foarte problematica si periculoasa. Articolele din presa te pot prosti/aburi doar daca nu stii despre ce e vorba (in general vorbind).

1. Exista o gramada de solutii pentru productia de energie electrica.
2. Toate celelalte solutii sunt mai ieftine, centralele nucleare necesita suport financiar la nivel de stat.
3. Toate celelalte solutii sunt mai putin periculoase. Nici o alta solutie pentru productia de energie electrica nu genereaza deseuri pentru care sa fie nevoie sa se planifice depozitatea pe sute/mii/sute de mii de ani.

Concret: Cheap dreams, expensive realities

"The first chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission, Lewis Strauss, predicted in a 1954 speech that nuclear power would someday make electricity “too cheap to meter.”

"The first generation of nuclear power plants proved so costly to build that half of them were abandoned during construction. Those that were completed saw huge cost overruns, which were passed on to utility customers in the form of rate increases. By 1985, Forbes had labeled U.S. nuclear power "the largest managerial disaster in business history.”

Adica diferenta intre afirmatia ta cum ca "pur si simplu nu exista altceva, ceva mai putin costisitor,mai putin periculos" si realitatea din teren cum ca de fapt "U.S. nuclear power is "the largest managerial disaster in business history" ar trebui sa te puna serios pe ganduri.

In alta ordine de idei nu inteleg panica...nu exista sursa de energie mai eficienta momentan.

Poate vrei sa zici ca nu este sursa de energie mai periculoasa, momentan.

"On the first day of 2019, the energy industry trade journal Power asked whether new technology can save nuclear power by making new reactors economically feasible...

The verdict from Peter Bradford, a former member of the federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission:...New nuclear is so far outside the competitive range..."

"Nuclear power belongs in a museum. We shouldn’t continue to squander public dollars on a technology that will never make economic sense..."

The Economic Viability of Nuclear Power Is Only Going Down

Surpriza..., nu?  (articolul e din 2019...)

Rage 2 Removes Denuvo DRM on Steam Following “a Few Requests”

Jocul ofera o cafteala epica care face toti banii. "Lumea" din joc trebuie "curatata" de mutanti, banditi, creaturi si tot ce impiedica existanta unei civilizatii normale. "Povestile" dupa...
Mediul e post-post apocaliptic, biomasa e doar intr-o faza incipienta de revenire, nu au rost comparatii cu fauna si flora din Far Cry.

dudes, trebuie sa vorbim, nu se poate.

fukushima nu stiu daca a fost repusa in functionare, parca sunt blocati de un verdit legal sau ceva.

Man, sa incepem cu asta. Accidentul de la centrala nucleara Fukushima Daiichi e cea mai mare catastrofa ecologica din istoria omenirii si totodata cel mai mare cover-up din istoria media.

Situatia de moment se orienteaza spre tentativa de a reduce contaminarea fenomenala permanenta si continua a oceanului Pacific., nici vorba de reparatii sau orice altceva.