"There are 400 million gamers that are using Radeon."
"I think ray tracing is important technology..., it’s something that we’re working on as well, from both a hardware/software standpoint."(Lisa Su - CES 2019)

Exact, nucleele respective executa doar sarcini dedicate. Nucleele Tensor sunt practic nucleele AI, iar cele pentru RT sunt incluse in ele si executa calcule legate de intersectia razelor cu triunghiuri, nimic altceva in cazul jocurilor. Deci nu este disponibila "performanta programabila" in plus.

"Almost half of all current jobs will become obsolete in just 15 years..."(Kai-Fu Lee/leading expert in artificial intelligence/former vice-president of Google Inc.)

Mai zice ca unii ar fi "safe" in "revolutia" cu AI, cum ar fi terapeuții, asistentele medicale, profesorii sau medicii. Se vede ca a imbatranit si nu mai e la curent cu evenimentele. De ex. profesorii sunt dintre cei mai expusi la a fi inlocuiti, precum si grosul medicilor.

De ex. din sectorul public aproape toti pot fi inlocuiti, inclusiv din politie si armata.

Estonia e prima tara care a introdus guvernul digital, functionarii publici fiind inlocuiti de sisteme informatice. Deci se poate daca se vrea.

Prabusirea ecosistemului, schimbarile climatice si automatizarea vor aduce vremuri interesante, cat de curand (ani).

Sunt destui pe care nu-i intereseaza RT si care ar cumpara ceva echivalent ca performanta cu 2080 la pret mai mic. Deci 1180 ar putea fi mai ieftine si cu consum ceva mai redus la aceeasi performanta, cu aceleasi cipuri Turing care ar putea fi dintre cele cu defecte in nucleele dedicate pentru RT si AI. In plus ar avea ceva nou de lansat in 2019 daca urmatoarea generatie e rezervata pentru 2020.

AMD Radeon Vega VII Official Gaming Performance and Technical Slides Detailed – Up To 68% Gain Over Radeon RX Vega 64

"The card features around 25% average performance uplift over the Radeon Vega 64 graphics card..."

Sunt gustoase de mori, toate. In plus, mancarea asiatica e ceva mai sanatoasa, fiind bazata mai mult pe carne legume si orez.

Nu cred ca biomasa s-a modificat in cantitate, doar in calitate.

Pentru ca ai o viziune prea simplista asupra problemei. Poate e nevoie de statistici care sa acopere direct problema in discutie:

"There is a lot of talk about loss of biodiversity but very little is said about the loss of total biomass. A huge amount of evidence exists to show that the overall biomass on land has been massively reduced over the past 3,000 years and increasingly evidence is coming to light in respect of the loss of biomass in the oceans. Loss of biomass on land may well be as great as 50%, loss of biomass in the seas could be as high as 80%. If this is correct one of the consequences of man’s actions over the past 3,000 years is that the overall annual living carbon cycle has been massively reduced by perhaps as much as 70% of what it would have been over the preceding four million years."

The Gaping Hole in Earth System

Si la asta se adauga efectele distrugerii biodiversitatii asupra intregului ecosistem.